inclusion: history of educ for people w disabilities - notes
[these notes were typed up to be passed on to others; they are a bit flippant and probably unclear; I will revise them if I ever have time. pwd="people with disabilities" throughout]
History of education for people with disabilities
General split between pre- and post-“enlightenment” eras:
PRE-enlightenment:
1200 – 1700 - Dominant belief = disabilities are supernatural
- Mental illness = possession by evil spirits
- Disease and ill fortune = sign that god(s) were turning against you
- “abnormal” babies killed, ppl mistreated
POST-enlightenment:
1800s - Science begins to replace religion as explanatory concept
Problems explained as genetic instead of spiritual
Results
- care is medical and supportive instead of punitive
- institutions have benevolent goal of “protecting” and “training”
- protect: pwd are seen as “eternal children” in need of protection
- train: goal that behavior or intellect can be improved & can return to society (transitional schooling)
- protect: pwd are seen as “eternal children” in need of protection
- basic idea is still paternalistic
- some are seen as “unteachable” and they are permanently institutionalized
POST-ENLIGHTENMENT TIMELINE
- 1800s through early 1900s - Urbanization / industrialization
- Rural social order could absorb “misfits” but new economic order is more demanding of conformity and ability
- “Alms houses” created where those who cannot support selves (widows, orphans, pwd) are “warehoused.”
- Less charitable era—pwd chained like animals & kept in abusive conditions
- Beginning of compulsory schooling
- Schools get larger, more factory-like
- students begin to be segregated by age and ability
- again, more “misfits” created
- Schools get larger, more factory-like
- Rural social order could absorb “misfits” but new economic order is more demanding of conformity and ability
- Mid- to late 1800s: emergence of special education
- idea of educating students w disab: blind and deaf first, then others
- schools were “clearing house” for all different kinds of pwd, and had wide age ranges
- “separate but equal” endorsed for perceived racial and ability differences definitely excluded from mainstream schools
I am trying to make sense of the lecture notes from the history lectureI think the attitude gradually got more compassionate during the 1800s, but I didn’t want to put that down without stating that I am not 100% sure about it. - idea of educating students w disab: blind and deaf first, then others
- 1920s Attitude shift: from protecting pwd to protecting society from the “deviant”
- growing sense that fed’l gov’t is responsible for caring for all people
- pseudo-scientific categorizing and labelling
- Such labels as “idiot, moron, imbecile”
- tests for determining which category people fit into
- include alcoholics and “morally degenerate” like prostitutes
- Such labels as “idiot, moron, imbecile”
- Development of the idea of “hereditarianism”
- Pwd pass on “undesirable” characteristics
- Institutionalize them to prevent them from “breeding”
- Psuedo-scientific justifications for racism
- Pwd pass on “undesirable” characteristics
- All kinds of bad stuff
- Eugenics movement (US mvt inspires Nazis)
- Restrict immigration / test immigrants
- Forced sterilization of “defective women” (60K people sterilized!) and immigrants
- Eugenics movement (US mvt inspires Nazis)
- growing sense that fed’l gov’t is responsible for caring for all people
- Depression and New Deal
- FDR has a disability but it is carefully hidden from public
- First federal money for pwd – money to states to support “blind, dependent or crippled”
- FDR has a disability but it is carefully hidden from public
- 1940s – 1950s
- Death camps make Eugenics movement look bad
- Postwar laws help wounded veterans with acquired disabilities
- Eventually these laws expanded to help everyone else incl those w genetic disab and mentally ill
- Brown v Board 1954 overturns separate but equal
- Beginnings of advocacy by parents of pwd for their inclusion in these rights
- Death camps make Eugenics movement look bad
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home